nanog mailing list archives
RE: ipv4's last graph
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf () tndh net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:01:34 -0800
So in the interest of 'second opinions never hurt', and I just can't get my head around "APnic sitting at 3 /8's, burning 2.3 /8's in the last 2 months and the idea of a 50% probability that their exhaustion event occurs Aug. 2011", here are a couple other graphs to consider. http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools.pdf http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools-zoom.pdf Tony
-----Original Message----- From: Geoff Huston [mailto:gih () apnic net] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:12 PM To: Randy Bush Cc: NANOG Operators' Group Subject: Re: ipv4's last graph On 01/02/2011, at 7:02 PM, Randy Bush wrote:with the iana free pool run-out, i guess we won't be getting thosenicegraphs any more. might we have one last one for the turnstiles? :-)/2and would you mind doing the curves now for each of the five rirs? gotta give us all something to repeat endlessly on lists and inpresos. but of course. http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/rir.jpg This is a different graph - it is a probabilistic graph that shows the predicted month when the RIR will be down to its last /8 policy (whatever that policy may be), and the relative probability that the event will occur in that particular month. The assumption behind this graph is that the barricades will go up across the regions and each region will work from its local address pools and service only its local client base, and that as each region gets to its last /8 policy the applicants will not transfer their demand to those regions where addresses are still available. Its not possible to quantify how (in)accurate this assumption may be, so beyond the prediction of the first exhaustion point (which is at this stage looking more likely to occur in July 2011 than not) the predictions for the other RIRs are highly uncertain. Geoff
Current thread:
- Re: ipv4's last graph, (continued)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Benson Schliesser (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Joel Jaeggli (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Geoff Huston (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Mark Smith (Feb 04)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Mark Townsley (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Rubens Kuhl (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Tore Anderson (Feb 02)
- RE: ipv4's last graph Tony Hain (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Matthew Petach (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Vincent Hoffman (Feb 02)
- RE: ipv4's last graph Tony Hain (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Ken Chase (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Richard Barnes (Feb 02)
- RE: ipv4's last graph Tony Hain (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)