nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 05:45:26 +0900
Dual stack isn't always the best approach. For networks that pass a large amount of traffic to a relatively small number of destinations, NAT64/DNS64 on a native v6 platform might be a better migration approach. If 90% of your traffic is v6, it is probably less trouble to use NAT64/DNS64 to reach that 10% than it is to dual-stack.
the scenario i think of here is the enterprise which wishes not to use private space so deploys v6-only internally, and nat64 at the border to a dual-stack provider. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Joe Abley (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Joe Abley (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Dobbins, Roland (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Brett Watson (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Richard Barnes (Feb 28)
- RE: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 George Bonser (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Cameron Byrne (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Mark Andrews (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Ray Soucy (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Jeff Kell (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Feb 27)