Re: quietly....

[George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>]

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:46 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:09:50 GMT, John Curran said:
> > We had a small ramp up in December (about 25% increase) but that is within
> > reasonable variation. Today was a little different, though, with 4 times
> > the normal request rate... that would be a "rush".
>
> Any trending on the rate of requests for IPv6 prefixes?

More interesting would be re-requests - organizations exhausting an
initial allocation and requiring more.  People asking for the first
one just indicates initial adoption rates.

Other than experimental blocks, I am generally under the impression
that IPv6 allocations are designed to avoid that being necessary for
an extended period of time.  If that is not true, then that's a flag.


-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert () gmail com