nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...


From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:22:10 -0600



On 2/11/2011 5:34 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
No, you grossly underestimate the motivation that will exist to get the
eyeball networks v6 capable.


eyeball networks... we hack and patch them together. Silly putty is very useful. IPv6 rollouts are no different. Just more silly putty.


IPv4 support for all the applications and appliances that don't support IPv6 is what will suck. So, don't worry about the ISP. Core networks are gearing up super fast (they've actually been at it for years, just not rolled it out), eyeballs will hack and patch easy enough (CPEs aren't that large a deal, and 6rd even gets us around internal v4 only problems in those isolated areas), many standard services on the net are v6 capable. Those which aren't, that's their own fault. They've had decades. :)



Jack


Current thread: