Re: Top webhosters offering v6 too?

[Fred Richards <fredr () geexology org>]

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:
> In message <AANLkTiksv84+tSm80AjyXg-XZDfX3NGJz1FJM0KQ64Hp () mail gmail com>, Fred
>  Richards writes:
> > I ran across this link a while back, it shows, of the top 100k
> > websites (according to Alexa), which ones are IPv6 enabled:
> >
> > http://www.atoomnet.net/ipv6_enabled_popular_websites.php?complete_list=3Dt=
> > rue
>
> And 1.5% of AAAA lookups, in the Alexa top 1000000, fail as the SOA
> is in the wrong section or the wrong SOA is returned or timeout or
> return NXDOMAIN when A returns a answer.  GLB vendors have a lot
> to answer for as almost all of these errors involve a GLB being
> installed.  Either their products are broken or their documentation
> is so poor that people can't configure their boxes properly.
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org

Hey, maybe all we need is an analysis site which says "warning: your
ipv6 is broken!".  And give reasons ... point out misconfiguration
like your examples above, regardless of whether it's dns or global
load balancers.  We'll see v6 adoption skyrocket overnight.  ;)



-- 
                      Fred