nanog mailing list archives
RE: Speed Test Results
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:28:24 -0600
We host an Ookla Speedtest server onsite and find it a very reliable means to identify throughput issues. The source of any performance issues may or may not be ours, but if a customer says things are slow we can usually identify whether it's their PC or network (browsing is slow but speed test runs fine) or a local or regional network issue (speed test runs slow). If a customer gets less than 90% of the advertised throughput, we follow up on it. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Michael Holstein [mailto:michael.holstein () csuohio edu] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 1:27 PM To: jacob miller Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Speed Test Results
Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards
to this.
They are excellent tools for generating user complaints. (just like the "do traceroute and count the hops" advice from gamer mags of old). (my $0.02) Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Current thread:
- Re: Speed Test Results, (continued)
- Re: Speed Test Results Octavio Alvarez (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Alex Brooks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Livingood, Jason (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 28)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel jaeggli (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Michael Holstein (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Graham Beneke (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joe Hamelin (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Frank Bulk (Dec 25)
- RE: Speed Test Results Scott Berkman (Dec 25)
- Re: Speed Test Results Grant Ridder (Dec 25)
- Re: Speed Test Results Sean Harlow (Dec 25)
- Re: Speed Test Results Graham Beneke (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Octavio Alvarez (Dec 23)