nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speed Test Results
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:23:26 +0000
They are completely unreliable and not to be trusted except for an occasional general indication of speed. -- Leigh Porter On 23 Dec 2011, at 09:20, "jacob miller" <mmzinyi () yahoo com> wrote:
Hi, Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. Regards, Jacob ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Speed Test Results jacob miller (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Leigh Porter (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Bret Clark (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joe Maimon (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Paul Stewart (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Cutler James R (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Brandon Kim (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Cutler James R (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results C Tate Baumrucker (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Octavio Alvarez (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Alex Brooks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Livingood, Jason (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 28)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Speed Test Results Leigh Porter (Dec 23)