nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP addresses are now assets
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:52:44 -0500
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu writes:
Would it be correct to summarize the ARIN position as "It's murkier than Cerner makes it out to be, and some lawyers are gonna get stinking filthy rich litigating this one"? :)
In any litigation, Counsel always wins. I often remind myself that there's still time to go to law school. :-) -r
Current thread:
- RE: IP addresses are now assets, (continued)
- RE: IP addresses are now assets Robert Bonomi (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Christopher J. Pilkington (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Ishmael Rufus (Dec 02)
- RE: IP addresses are now assets John Lightfoot (Dec 02)
- RE: IP addresses are now assets Robert Bonomi (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Jimmy Hess (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 01)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Paul Graydon (Dec 01)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 05)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Joly MacFie (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- RE: IP addresses are now assets Leigh Porter (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Martin Hannigan (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Paul Graydon (Dec 01)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets joshua sahala (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Ricky Beam (Dec 02)