nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons () queuefull net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:05:12 -0600
On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Fred Baker wrote:We're going to be hearing a lot more of these. It's the nature of finite resources, and of human nature when faced with them. At some point, this will find its way into courtrooms under the rubric of a barrier to entry. It already has in terms of antitrust when a company wanted to move its PA prefix to different upstream.I've had transit service pulled, so the provider can reclaim the /21 that was bundled with the transit.
I'm sorry to hear about that... Do you know why they reclaimed the block? E.g. was it used to support a "higher margin" service for another customer? -Benson
Current thread:
- Sad IPv4 story? Franck Martin (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Matthew Kaufman (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Franck Martin (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Fred Baker (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Benson Schliesser (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Blackman (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Benson Schliesser (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Blackman (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Benson Schliesser (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jared Mauch (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Doug Barton (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Deepak Jain (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jared Mauch (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Owen DeLong (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Keegan Holley (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? bmanning (Dec 10)