nanog mailing list archives

Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering

From: Vlad Galu <galu () packetdam com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:34:51 +0000

Randy Carpenter wrote:

BGP is working fine, it is when they are trying to forward the packets back to me. They are seeing the Link-Local as 
the next-hop, which, for some reason, they cannot get to.


-Randy

Sorry Randy, I'd skimmed through your initial mail too quickly andmissed the point.

Current thread:

Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Bush (Dec 07)
  - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Vlad Galu (Dec 07)
  - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Vlad Galu (Dec 07)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jack Bates (Dec 07)
  - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Owen DeLong (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Leo Bicknell (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Peter Rubenstein (Dec 07)
  - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Justin M. Streiner (Dec 07)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jack Bates (Dec 07)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Vicky Shrestha (Dec 07)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jen Linkova (Dec 08)
    - Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 09)

(Thread continues...)