nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH CPE landscape
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:08:28 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com>
On Aug 4, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:- Generic consumer grade NAT/FirewallHobby horse: please make sure it support bridge mode? Those of us who want to put our own routers on the wire will hate you otherwise.Why? As long as it can be a transparent router, why would it need to be a bridge?
Ask a Verizon FiOS customer who wants to run IPv4 VPNs. He didn't say IPv6 only, right? I have a couple of customers who can't get bridge mode on residence FiOS service, and therefore can't run their own routers to terminate IPsec. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- FTTH CPE landscape Jason Lixfeld (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Dan White (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Dan Armstrong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape PC (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape PC (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 04)