nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:56:35 -0400
On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:10 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:Next time Cogent de-peers someone, customers do not care who was being more reasonable. They care that their links are broken.Wouldn't that mostly affect people who are silly enough to single-home to a Tier-1 that gets involved in a peering dispute?
Which $PROBLEM does not affect only those who are "silly enough" to not put mitigation tools for $PROBLEM? And the customers still don't care. They just care _that_ it affected them - at least during the problem. Although one can hope they care enough to change their behavior afterward. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines Adam Rothschild (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Niclas Comstedt (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Joly MacFie (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W . Gilmore (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Seth Mattinen (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 28)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Adam Rothschild (Aug 27)