nanog mailing list archives
RE: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:16:57 +0000
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patrick () ianai net] Sent: 24 August 2011 14:46 To: NANOG list Subject: Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic zone standards. We don't secure equipment inside our buildings to seismic zone standards.They should be. They should be. You should. Earthquakes can happen anywhere. There's no excuse to fail tobuild/secure to earthquake standards. Tornados can happen anywhere, there's no excuse to fail to build/secure for tornados. [Etc.] Things that cost money are not done unless the probability of the danger is higher than vanishingly small. This temblor - at 5.8 with no injuries or fatalities - was the largest earthquake on the entire east coast in 67 years, and the largest in VA in well over a century. Think of the _trillions_ of dollars which could have been put into healthcare, public safety, hell, better networking equipment :) we could have used instead of making all buildings on the east coast earthquake safe.
Indeed, we are not going to be building earthquake proof buildings in London for example. Riot proof maybe.. -- Leigh Porter ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011, (continued)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Sean Donelan (Aug 23)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Scott Morris (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 - comment and a bit of a Christchurch Telco report :) Don Gould (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 - comment and a bit of a Christchurch Telco report :) Michael Painter (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 - comment and a bit of a Christchurch Telco report :) Don Gould (Aug 25)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 - comment and a bit of a Christchurch Telco report :) Mark Foster (Aug 25)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 - comment and a bit of a Christchurch Telco report :) Mark Foster (Aug 25)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 - comment and a bit of a Christchurch Telco report :) Don Gould (Aug 25)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 JC Dill (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 24)
- RE: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Leigh Porter (Aug 24)
- RE: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Sean Donelan (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Roy (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Sean Donelan (Aug 25)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Steven Bellovin (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Seth Mattinen (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Jay Ashworth (Aug 24)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 JC Dill (Aug 26)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Jay Ashworth (Aug 26)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 26)
- Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011 Gary Buhrmaster (Aug 24)