nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH CPE landscape
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 10:06:38 -0700
On Aug 5, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com>A transparent router (sorry, poor choice of terminology on my part) is a router which doesn't NAT or become selectively opaque (firewall). In other words, it forwards packets and it doesn't do any other arbitrary things to them at the whim of the ISP, but, rather passes along what the customer gives it to the ISP and vice versa without interference. It differs from a bridge in that it terminates the collision and broadcast domains on either side of it.It differs from a bridge in that *it requires a chunk of routable IP space to put behind it*, and a route to go there. For the specific situation I posited, a consumer connection, you can get a static IP, but you *will not* get routable space; you have to go to a business connection for that, at 2-4 times the cost.
That really depends on the ISP, doesn't it? Owen
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape, (continued)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Cutler James R (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Scott Helms (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Jamie Bowden (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Tom Hill (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Kenneth Ratliff (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jay Ashworth (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Owen DeLong (Aug 05)
- RE: FTTH CPE landscape Eric Wieling (Aug 05)
- Re: FTTH CPE landscape Jason Lixfeld (Aug 04)