RE: IPv6 Prefix announcing

["Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith () adhost com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm () rollernet us]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:52 PM
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Prefix announcing
>
> On 4/26/2011 09:39, Kate Gerry wrote:
> > Funny enough, some carriers actually require the 'smallest' as being /32... :(
>
> This is becoming the exception now, not the rule.
>
> Last year I was fighting with Verizon about their refusal to carry /48s.
> That, together with the impasse of figuring out how to put dual stack
> IPv6 on an Ethernet port (it was delivered as IPv4 only multiple times),
> I never accepted it and went with a competitor who got it right the
> first time. However, I've had several sources tell me Verizon has since
> backpedaled and now accepts /48s.
>
> ~Seth

*> 2001:67C:120::/48    2001:504:16::1B1B       150      0 6939 701 12702 43751 6716 i

Mike