Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

["Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith () adhost com>]

I thought iced-over fiber was a little bit like muffler-bearings.  Great
excuse if they buy it.

Mike

On 4/1/11 6:07 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> wrote:

> It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.
>
> Owen
>
> On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:
>
> > I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
> >
> > ----- Reply message -----
> > From: "Scott Morris" <swm () emanon com>
> > Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am
> > Subject: v6 Avian Carriers?
> > To: <nanog () nanog org>
> >
> > Mmm...  Good question.  Would it actually come back OUT in a
> > recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
> >
> > I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross.   ;)
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > > I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.
> > > So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet
> > > loss or tunneling?
> > >
> > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> > >
> > >
> > > Marc