nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIP Justification
From: James Downs <egon () egon cc>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:53:40 -0700
On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
The 1% where it was a necessary evil... dialup networking where the only routing protocol supported was RIP (v2) [netblazers] -- static IP clients had to be able to land anywhere -- but RIP only lived on the local segment, OSPF took over network-wide. (Later MaxTNT's were setup with OSPF
I remember RIP across chassis for the TotalControl bonded dialup stuff, and as you mention, static IPs, but I haven't seen it in serious use for a long time.
Cheers, -j
Current thread:
- RE: RIP Justification, (continued)
- RE: RIP Justification Gary Gladney (Sep 29)
- RE: RIP Justification George Bonser (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Christopher Gatlin (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Mark Smith (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Christopher Gatlin (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Owen DeLong (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Mark Smith (Sep 29)
- RE: RIP Justification Gary Gladney (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification James Downs (Sep 29)
- RE: RIP Justification Brandon Kim (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Jesse Loggins (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Nick Hilliard (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Chris Woodfield (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification William McCall (Sep 29)