nanog mailing list archives
RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked?
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:31:21 -0700
-----Original Message----- From: Nathan Eisenberg [mailto:nathan () atlasnetworks us] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:05 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked?Maybe you didn't recognize the original poster, but I did, and Iwould takewhat he had to say at least seriously enough to have a look. Hisfollowupmail, while not giving people the information they wanted (as if itreallymatters) did mention that the upstream appears to have cut them off.Thatis a pretty good indication that *something* was going on there. I don't believe it is anyone's job here to conform to theexpectations ofanyone else aside from general list etiquette and some level ofsanity. Heput the information out, it is up to the reader in how they weightit. I don'tunderstand your continued banging on the issue. All he did was put information out there. He doesn't need to meet your criteria, youare free toapply that as you will in the privacy of your own cubicle.George, Again - appealing to personal authority is a fallacy. It carries no logical weight who the poster is, and has no place in a decision
making
process of such magnitude.
Again, nobody said the original poster had any authority over anything. He posted a suspicion. It would be up to the individual entities involved to decide if they actually want to take any action based on that or not. Nobody said anyone had to do anything and anyone who blocks traffic based ONLY on a message to a mailing list is an imbecile anyway. Nobody handing any major amounts of traffic is going to base their filtration on third party mailing list postings so I really don't see what the issue is. I read the original post as a call to look into it and that they were going to be reported to ARIN for further looking into. The original posting said "some folks may wish to blackhole the above" and that is all. But it did strike me as odd that a North Carolina regional ISP would have only a single peer and that peer has no presence that I can determine in North Carolina.
Current thread:
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?, (continued)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? N. Yaakov Ziskind (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Andrew Kirch (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Scott Howard (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? William Herrin (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? George Bonser (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? George Bonser (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? George Bonser (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Justin Horstman (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Franck Martin (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? Franck Martin (Sep 29)
- RE: AS11296 -- Hijacked? George Bonser (Sep 30)