nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routers in Data Centers
From: "James P. Ashton" <james () gitflorida com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:57:04 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message ----- On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Heath Jones <hj1980 () gmail com> wrote:
But it seems, that NetFPGA has not enough memory to hold a full view (current 340k routes).It's just a development platform for prototyping designs, not something you would use in production... I want to use it to implement and test ideas that I have, and play with some different forwarding architectures, not use it as a final product :)
also, does a datacenter router/switch need a full table? isn't that the job of the peering/transit routers in your scheme? Sometimes, but often you get odd results when internal gateway routers only see a pair of default gateways via OSPF or IS-IS. Sometimes the only real fix is to have a full table on these routers as well as your border/peering routers. James
Current thread:
- Re: Routers in Data Centers, (continued)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Steven King (Sep 25)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Adam Armstrong (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers ym1r . jr (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Adrian Chadd (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Rubens Kuhl (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Adrian Chadd (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Heath Jones (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Heath Jones (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers James P. Ashton (Sep 26)
- Re: Routers in Data Centers Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 27)