nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software-based Border Router
From: Ingo Flaschberger <if () xip at>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:58:29 +0200 (CEST)
Another big problem for Linux/Unix-based routers of this size/cost is upgrade-ability. If you need to add cards, you are going to have to bring the router down for extended periods. Likewise, a software upgrade can be a bigger deal than on a purpose designed router. If a router is mission critical, Linux/Unixed-based has issues over extended periods.
depends on knowledge, as mentioned in previous post. I have 2 software based border routers - no problem bringing one down. 700kpps for 1200eur that can handle a full view. and changing line-cards - could be really funny at c6500. kind regards, Ingo Flaschberger
Current thread:
- Software-based Border Router Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router sthaug (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 26)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Dennis Burgess (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Fletcher Kittredge (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router khatfield (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router cmaurand (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 28)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 28)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router sthaug (Sep 26)