![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software-based Border Router
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:03:53 -0700
If one has a cisco 7200, then you have a software based border router. Considerations, for a given router platform are capacity, susceptability to dos, features required etc. Depending on the capacity required a software device could do fine. If it's in front of hosting environment you want to know that it doesn't take dirt nap from a couple hundred mb/s of small packet. Joel's widget number 2 On Sep 26, 2010, at 2:41, "Nathanael C. Cariaga" <nccariaga () stluke com ph> wrote:
Hi All! Just want to ask if anyone here had experience deploying software-based routers to serve as perimeter / border router? How does it gauge with hardware-based routers? Any past experiences will be very much appreciated. I wanted to know because we've been asked if we want to assume full control of the internet link (up to the router). By assuming control up to the router, we still want to configure iBGP with our parent network so that we can take advantage of some routes available to the parent network's gateway. The saddest part is presently we do not have the router to serve as our gateway this is why we are considering the use of software-based routers. Thank you.
Current thread:
- RE: Software-based Border Router, (continued)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Seth Mattinen (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Michael DeMan (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Chris Adams (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Jake Khuon (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Bret Clark (Sep 27)