nanog mailing list archives
Re: OpenFlow
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:30:55 +0200
On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your spam, and forget to remove your .sig Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the opposite!)
And also, there is a nice agenda item at NANOG50; http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog50/abstracts.php?pt=MTY2OSZuYW5vZzUw&nm=nanog50 8<----------------------------------------------------------------- Track: Open Flow Nick McKeown, Stanford University; Matt Davy, Indiana University Presentation Date: October 4, 2010, 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM Abstract: OpenFlow: An Update [..] OpenFlow Trials and Deployments ----------------------------------------------------------------->8 Thus as it is a NANOG-ish topic, I wonder why somebody needs to hide. Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- OpenFlow nanogf . (Sep 24)
- RE: OpenFlow Matlock, Kenneth L (Sep 24)
- Re: OpenFlow Jeroen Massar (Sep 24)
- Re: OpenFlow Christian Esteve (Sep 24)
- Re: OpenFlow tammy-lists (Sep 24)
- RE: OpenFlow Matlock, Kenneth L (Sep 24)
- Re: OpenFlow Jeroen Massar (Sep 24)
- Re: OpenFlow tammy-lists (Sep 24)
- Re: OpenFlow Jeroen Massar (Sep 24)
- RE: OpenFlow Matlock, Kenneth L (Sep 24)