nanog mailing list archives
Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:22:05 -0700
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:There really isn't a lot of choice, 2 providers, and some minor choice in how much speed you want to pay for with each one.Does that mean no CLECs like Covad or DSL.net who colocate in the AT&T CO, rent unbundled dry copper pairs and take it up from there themselves? Does that mean no ISPs who buy/rent last+middle mile transport from AT&T ADSL network at Layer 2 (ATM) and provide their own IP layer? MS
In many metros, yes. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Michael Sokolov (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Leo Bicknell (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Leo Bicknell (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Jeromie Reeves (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Michael Painter (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Michael Sokolov (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? William Herrin (Sep 20)