nanog mailing list archives
Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:05:04 +0100
You need to go to qqwqaaqws.ipq.co to find out more... On 10 Sep 2010, at 18:44, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Reese wrote:A friend brought this to my attention: http://ipq.co/ He saw it at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1678324 I'm not sure whether to shriek in joy or in pain. Will data from this service - if it is a worthy service - propagate properly? Play nicely with or break other people's toys? Is it a gimmick?How's it going to break anything? I just created one... tentententen.ipq.co. 86400 IN A 10.10.10.10 so...now I can use tentententen.ipq.co as a name that resolves to 10.10.10.10...assuming I trust ipq.co to keep that A record and not delete or change it at some point. Other than the fact that you can't change it[1], how is this any different (other than being less useful) or scarier than DynDNS? 1. EMAIL ADDRESS optional, but will allow you to update the record later (once we implement it) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Reese (Sep 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Jack Carrozzo (Sep 10)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Jon Lewis (Sep 10)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Leigh Porter (Sep 10)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? N. Yaakov Ziskind (Sep 11)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Scott Howard (Sep 11)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Christopher Morrow (Sep 11)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Christopher Morrow (Sep 11)