nanog mailing list archives
Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txtDrafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they?
must be some blowhard i have plonked
Drafts are drafts. Even most RFCs are RFCs and nothing more. Only a handful have ever been designated as "Standards". I hope this becomes one of those in the hope it will be taken seriously. (It already is by anyone with a large network running IPv6.)
juniper and cisco implement today randy
Current thread:
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption, (continued)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Leslie Nobile (Oct 19)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jens Link (Oct 18)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Warren Kumari (Oct 17)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 17)