Re: RIP Justification

[Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>]

----- "Ruben Guerra" <Ruben.Guerra () arrisi com> wrote:

> Using BGP would be overkill for most. Many small commercial customers
> to not want the complexity of BGP

This one keeps coming up.

Leaf-node BGP config is utterly trivial, and is much easier for the SP to configure the necessary safety devices on 
their side to stop you from shooting yourself in the foot and blowing up your networks - or worse, *their* network.  
Plus, if / when in the future you need to do something clever, you've already got the routing protocol with all the 
advanced knobs in place, ready for you to tweak as needed.

The Enterprise guys really need to get out of the blanket "BGP is scary" mindset - running BGP for an SP with 
multitudes of customers, peers, transits, aggregation, filters etc and getting it right needs expertise and experience. 
 Announcing a /24 LAN and receiving a default on a single link, not so much.

> or want to spend money on extra
> resources (routers that actually support it)

This has a bit more weight to it, if you're at the really low end (certainly the consumer end).  But a BGP-capable 
Cisco 800-series is, what, £300?

Regards,
Tim.