nanog mailing list archives
Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:34:54 -0400
I've found lots of domains with +all which really should be -all since they were all spam. Jared Mauch On Oct 4, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us> wrote:
If it passes SPF we remove a few points of the spam weight.I would rethink this practice. Many spammers publish SPF valid records these days precisely because of this. Nathan
Current thread:
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408), (continued)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Douglas Otis (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) William Herrin (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Tony Finch (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Kevin Stange (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Stefan Bethke (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Douglas Otis (Oct 05)
- re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nick Olsen (Oct 04)
- RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Jared Mauch (Oct 04)
- RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)