nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:43:26 -0400
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Sven Olaf Kamphuis <sven () cb3rob net> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Randy Carpenter wrote:----- Original Message -----On 10/26/2010 12:04 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:In practice, the RIRs are implementing sparse allocation which makes it possible to aggregate subsequent allocations. I.e. not as bad as it may seem.Except, if you are given bare minimums, and you are assigning out to subtending ISPs bare minimums, those subtending ISPs will end up with multiple networks. Some of them are BGP speakers. I can't use sparse allocation because I was given minimum space and not the HD-Ratio threshold space.Wait... If you are issuing space to ISPs that are multihomed, they should be getting their own addresses. Even if they aren't multihomed, they should probably be getting their own addresses. Why would you be supplying them with address space if they are an ISP? -Randyto my knowledge, RIPE still does not issue ipv6 PI space. so giving them their own space, is "problematic" to say the least.
ISP's get an LIR assignemnt from RIPE, no? <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-481.html#lir> Customers could get an end-user assignment (PA space normally or PI) <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-481.html#_8._IPv6_Provider> (ripe PI assignment policies) -chris
-- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG ========================================================================= Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE267268209 D-13359 Registration: HRA 42834 B BERLIN Phone: +31/(0)87-8747479 Germany GSM: +49/(0)152-26410799 RIPE: CBSK1-RIPE e-Mail: sven () cb3rob net ========================================================================= <penpen> C3P0, der elektrische Westerwelle ========================================================================= Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Jack Bates (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Nick Hilliard (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Jack Bates (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Nick Hilliard (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Randy Carpenter (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Eugeniu Patrascu (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Christopher Morrow (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- RE: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? George Bonser (Oct 26)
- RE: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Antonio Querubin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Blake Dunlap (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- RE: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Chris Boyd (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 26)