nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTP Server
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 01:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Cutler James R wrote:
In my experience, a reliable NTP peer group can be implemented on the same set of boxes as DNS (bind, etc.) with little or no impact on DNS performance. If you can count to four or more, you can make a reliable peer group of time servers.
There are lots of alternatives. CableLabs' designs tend to tie togetherDHCP, DNS, NTP, TFTP and headends. DSL forum designs tend to split them apart.
If you have a set of systems which are already configured and accessedby end-user systems, such as DNS or DHCP or Active Directory, then NTP is just one more protocol with many of the same risks on those systems. Shared fate also makes trouble shooting easier, because a problem will usually affect all of the services.
Other alternatives such as multicast NTP tend to work better with a device on each LAN (such as a router). And still other alternatives tend to work better with specialized servers if you need hardware assist or auditing. But again, it comes back to what are your requirements. For some people, the built-in WindowsTime service meets their needs. Other people need specialized clock hardware connected directly to their systems.
Current thread:
- Re: NTP Server, (continued)
- Re: NTP Server John Kristoff (Oct 25)
- Re: NTP Server Matthew Petach (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Marshall Eubanks (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Dobbins, Roland (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Jorge Amodio (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Sean Donelan (Oct 24)
- RE: NTP Server Brandon Kim (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Seth Mattinen (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Marcus Reid (Oct 25)
- Re: NTP Server Seth Mattinen (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Cutler James R (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Sean Donelan (Oct 24)
- Re: NTP Server Martin Hotze (Oct 24)