nanog mailing list archives
RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
From: "Scott Berkman" <scott () sberkman net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:17:05 -0500
Unless I am missing something, Level3 is just the transit provider. Level 3 (via one of their acquisition a few years back) does have a very popular CDN product, but even if they are the source from an IP perspective, they still do not own the content, that is still primarily the networks and studios. Also as to GoogleTV, from what I have seen so far they are simply providing an interface (via an OS for 3rd party hardware) to access already available content, so yes they would be affected. -Scott -----Original Message----- From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm () rollernet us] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 6:02 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions On 11/29/2010 14:40, Rettke, Brian wrote:
Essentially, the question is who has to pay for the infrastructure to
support the bandwidth requirements of all of these new and booming streaming ventures. I can understand both the side taken by Comcast, and the side of the content provider, but I don't think it's as simple as the slogans spewed out regarding "Net Neutrality", which has become so misused and abused as a term that I don't think it has any credulous value remaining.
Is Level3 the content provider though? Or did Comcast just decide they don't want to do the settlement free peering thing anymore for traffic transiting via Level 3? ~Seth
Current thread:
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions, (continued)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Rettke, Brian (Nov 29)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Aaron Wendel (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Warren (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Aaron Wendel (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions JC Dill (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Allen Simpson (Nov 30)
- Telstra Breakup (Was Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions) Leo Bicknell (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Florian Weimer (Nov 30)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Scott Berkman (Nov 29)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions George Bonser (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Ren Provo (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Bret Clark (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Pitcock (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Matthew Petach (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Sean Donelan (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Bret Clark (Nov 30)