nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:47 -0500
On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:This is always the best way to deal with disagreement. But I think this is the wrong list to tender such contracts. Also, it's odd you hate DDOS's more than murder. Time to take some time off work perhaps? For the first time I'm hoping to not meet some of the nanog members in person at a Nanog conference should I ever attend....I think you've got it backwards. See if he's actively like this in person. Email ... "changes things" with communication. Adrian
There's quite a few right now off list laughing, as they know full well that I'm exactly like this when faced with a threat towards friends and family serving in uniform overseas. Andrew
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joe Provo (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ingo Flaschberger (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Adrian Chadd (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Wil Schultz (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 30)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Stefan Fouant (Nov 28)