nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:31:46 -0800
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net> wrote:On 11/18/2010 5:14 PM, Lee Riemer wrote:Try tracerouting to 2001:500:4:13::81 (www.arin.net) or 2001:470:0:76::2 (www.he.net) via Cogent.Interesting. I noticed a similar issue with ipv6.cnn.com today. I dont see it via TATA, but see it via Cogent. So whats the story behind it and ARIN not being seen through cogent ? Is it due to no v6 relation bewtween he.net and Cogent ? 2620:0:2200:8:8888:8888:8888:8901 (whats with the crazy 8s?)Wow. CNN now has IPv6. That's awesome. I guess i missed the memo. So, major players with IPv6 are? ipv6.cnn.com (just book marked it) ipv6.comcast.net ipv6.google.com (or you can have it all with a white-list) www.ipv6.cisco.com www.v6.facebook.com m.v6.facebook.com ipv6.t-mobile.com (admittedly, not major a major content source, but it's mine)
Yahoo just dropped in on the IPv6 content party http://ipv6.weather.yahoo.com/ I just bookmarked it. Well done Yahoos. Cameron ======= http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta =======
And, then debunking the "dual-stack is too risky" notion is www.ucla.edu (which is a big business by most measures) and serves AAAA and A records without a white-list or special FQDN. I have predicted that by the end of 2011 nearly ~50% of my network traffic (mobile provider) can be served by IPv6 natively end to end. I think a lot of folks that measure Facebook and Google (including YouTube) traffic today can see how that is feasible given current volumes and rates of growth. Hence, the viability of IPv6-only endpoints (especially mobile) with NAT64/DNS64 as truly connecting the IPv4 long-tail remaining 50% that will continue to shrink as more major sites follow the CNN's path. Cameron ======= http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta =======
Current thread:
- IPv6 Nick Olsen (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Mike Tancsa (Nov 18)
- RE: IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Lee Riemer (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Mike Tancsa (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Mike Tancsa (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Jack Bates (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Chuck Anderson (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 sthaug (Nov 22)
- RE: IPv6 George Bonser (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 Matthew Petach (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 TJ (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 Lee Riemer (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Matthew Petach (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 John Gammons (Nov 22)