nanog mailing list archives

Re: Blocking International DNS


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:59:07 -0800


On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Joe Abley wrote:


On 2010-11-22, at 00:00, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:

Indeed, offshore resolvers, offshore DNS infrastructure and the
progressive's futile attempts at interference with free markets is
once again thwarted. We all know that U.S. law helps keep the internet
safe </sarcasm>

You don't think

"(i) a service provider, as that term is defined in section 512(k)(1) of title 17, United States Code, or other 
operator of a domain name system server shall take reasonable steps that will prevent a domain name from resolving to 
that domain name’s Internet protocol address;"

could be taken as a requirement for providers to intercept attempts to use off-network DNS resolvers and manage such 
requests to meet the end goal above?

Given that many providers already do this (for whatever reason), it's not much of a stretch to see someone declaring 
that such behaviour falls under the umbrella of "reasonable steps".

I'm not suggesting that I think any of this is reasonable or sensible, but it does seem to imply an operational 
burden on service providers.


If it does, then, you'll find open tunnel servers providing tunnels to off-shore DNS services.

Sigh.


I really wish congress had better things to do than getting into a technology arms race with the people of the united 
states.
Oh, wait, they do have better things to do, they just aren't doing them.

Owen



Current thread: