nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 rDNS
From: David Freedman <david.freedman () uk clara net>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:49:55 +0000
Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
would be interested in anybody other than IRC operators who feel they still require forward and reverse DNS to match, SMTP, email-2 (don't ask ;), and preferably (though not required) anything that has to do with /bin/login on *nix systems (as it shows the reverse dns host name in who and w and last unless specified otherwise).
Well, at least with DNSSEC, you can assure the end user that the wildcarding was intentional (through validation), I dont see why those systems shouldn't be acceptant of intentionally obscured hosts in the future ? Saying that, I quite like the idea of dynamically providing a response to both AAAA and PTR queries but question how safe it would be to cache these without a robust resource-managing implementation... Dave. -- David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Group
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 rDNS Lee Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS David Freedman (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS David Freedman (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Leo Bicknell (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Curtis Maurand (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Lamar Owen (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Crist Clark (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS David Freedman (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Michel de Nostredame (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Mark Andrews (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Mark Andrews (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Mark Andrews (Nov 01)