nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns


From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:07:53 -0800

Mark Andrews wrote:
Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4.  Easier to
debug failures.

Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now.

Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter?

Thanks,
Jeroen

--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html


Current thread: