nanog mailing list archives

Re: experience with equinix exchange


From: Steve Miller <stmille () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:01:39 -0800

politics, finance...


On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:

What are the layer 8-9 issues?

Drive Slow,
Paul Wall

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net> wrote:

On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:

Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at any
of
their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
people
really love or hate it.

-shac


Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and layer9
seem the lacking part
which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they seem
to be the largest IX

per


https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipantsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC

so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they are
reliable.

mehmet





Current thread: