nanog mailing list archives
Re: experience with equinix exchange
From: Steve Miller <stmille () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:01:39 -0800
politics, finance... On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:
What are the layer 8-9 issues? Drive Slow, Paul Wall On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net> wrote:On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at anyoftheir major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering ifpeoplereally love or hate it. -shacEquinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and layer9seem the lacking partwhich could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they seemto be the largest IXperhttps://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipantsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESCso being there while you are in that location seems good, and they arereliable.mehmet
Current thread:
- RE: experience with equinix exchange, (continued)
- RE: experience with equinix exchange Aaron Wendel (Nov 28)
- RE: experience with equinix exchange Ryan Finnesey (Nov 28)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Bill Woodcock (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Mehmet Akcin (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Elmar K. Bins (Nov 30)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Fredy Kuenzler (Nov 29)
- Re: experience with equinix exchange Steve Miller (Nov 18)
- more wardrobe options bmanning (Nov 18)