nanog mailing list archives
Re: mtu question
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:22:43 -0800
I think that the MTU on LO is pretty irrelevant in general. If it does matter, larger is probably better. Owen On Nov 17, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi I just see that the mtu in lo is different from standard eth 1500 Any meaning of it? eg: Standard eth 1500 in linux. lo mtu 16436 in solaris. lo mtu is 8232 How about cisco / juniper loopback? Thank you so much
Current thread:
- mtu question Deric Kwok (Nov 17)
- Re: mtu question Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: mtu question Jack Bates (Nov 17)
- RE: mtu question Brandon Kim (Nov 17)
- Re: mtu question Mark Smith (Nov 17)
- RE: mtu question Brandon Kim (Nov 17)
- RE: mtu question Brandon Kim (Nov 17)
- Re: mtu question Pete Lumbis (Nov 17)