nanog mailing list archives
Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:15:33 +0200
On (2010-11-17 14:40 +0100), Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
We asked some customers what gear they are running, and here is a short compilation - all these systems were affected by the BGP flaps: - Cisco 2821 - c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-20.T4 - Cisco 2821 - c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin - Cisco ASR1002F - asr1000rp1-adventerprisek9.03.01.01.S.150-1.S1.bin - Juniper MX480 - junos 10.0R3.10
I think we really need community tool to test BGP implementations against known/past bugs and unknown (fuzzied) bugs. Simple script which has two eBGP sessions to network being tested, one injecting routes and another receiving them should be enough. There are quite few BGP APIs out there with pretty ready infra, some even have test infra ready: https://github.com/jesnault/bgp4r I'm happy to contribute test cases if such project surfaces, but at the moment I'm not ready to start the project. Maybe next time my network blows up due to BGP bug, I'll find time. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Fredy Kuenzler (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Alexandre Snarskii (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Tarko Tikan (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Fredy Kuenzler (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 James Stahr (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Saku Ytti (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Florian Weimer (Nov 18)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 mc (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Tarko Tikan (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21 Alexandre Snarskii (Nov 17)