nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS path question.
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:02:27 -0600
On 11/10/2010 5:44 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
I dunno. There was a bug with AS lengths or something not that far back. Didn't effect any of my stuff, but just to be safe I added it to all my routers. I don't know where I came up with the magical 75 number, but it definitely seems reasonable that anything with 75+ ASNs in the path probably don't deserve to be in my table.Do you think (or is there evidence) that very many ASs use maxas-limit type commands? I have never used it and never had any problems...
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: AS path question., (continued)
- Re: AS path question. Jack Bates (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Justin M. Streiner (Nov 10)
- RE: AS path question. Holmes,David A (Nov 10)
- re: AS path question. Nick Olsen (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Greg Whynott (Nov 10)
- RE: AS path question. Stefan Fouant (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. John Osmon (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Joe Provo (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Greg Whynott (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Scott Weeks (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Jack Bates (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Scott Weeks (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Jack Bates (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Nick Hilliard (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Nick Hilliard (Nov 17)
- RE: AS path question. Rettke, Brian (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Jon Lewis (Nov 10)
- RE: AS path question. George Bonser (Nov 10)
- Re: AS path question. Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: AS path question. Jon Lewis (Nov 11)
- Re: AS path question. Jack Bates (Nov 11)