nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses)
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:02:44 -0400
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:01:32 PDT, Owen DeLong said:On Nov 3, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:Actually PI is WORSE if you can't get it routed as it requires NAT or it requires MANUAL configuration of the address selection rules to be used with PA.It's very easy to get PIv6 routed for free, so, I don't see the issue there.It may be very easy to get it routed for free *now*. Will it be possible to get PIv6 routed for free once there's 300K entries in the IPv6 routing table? Or zillions, as everybody and their pet llama start using PI prefixes? (Hey, if you managed to get PI to use instead of using an ULA, and routing it is "free", may as well go for it, right?)Hopefully by the time it gets to that point we'll have finally come up with a scaleable routing paradigm. Certainly we need to do that anyway. I'm not sure why we chose not to do that with IPv6 in the first place.
because: 1) there were only going to be a limited number of ISP's b) every end site gets PA only iii) no need for pi d) all of the above
Current thread:
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses), (continued)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Mark Andrews (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Mark Andrews (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Verizon off-list contact requested Edward A. Trdina III (Nov 03)
- Re: Verizon off-list contact requested Doug Barton (Nov 03)
- Re: Verizon off-list contact requested Seth Mattinen (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Stephen Sprunk (Nov 01)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)