nanog mailing list archives
Re: DWDM hardware recommendations
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 12:36:24 +0100
On 23 May 2010, at 09:31, Matthew Walster <matthew () walster org> wrote:
No complaints here apart from the need to use MU connectors.
MU gives slightly lower attenuation than other types of physical connector (i.e. non spliced). It's a minor pain if you don't have an easy source of MU patch cables, but there are sound reasons for using it.
I use Transmode kit, and have found it to be very reliable. Would have no problem recommending it to others.
Nick
Current thread:
- DWDM hardware recommendations ML (May 22)
- Re: DWDM hardware recommendations Matthew Walster (May 23)
- Re: DWDM hardware recommendations Nick Hilliard (May 23)
- Re: DWDM hardware recommendations Raphael Maunier (May 23)
- Re: DWDM hardware recommendations chip (May 24)
- Re: DWDM hardware recommendations Matthew Walster (May 23)