nanog mailing list archives
Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 21:51:33 +0100
On 1 May 2010, at 21:43, ML wrote:
Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for providing a complete internet table to customers? Waive the surcharge for sufficiently large commits?
Compared with some kind of reduced/waived fee for partial, or default only, or static routes ? I have seen some of my customers get charged a set up fee (NRC) for bgp (beyond the port fee). Normally an indication to me that we're going to have problems with this supplier.... And I have never seen this as an MRC, but I guess it could happen. Run a mile if so. Andy
Current thread:
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?, (continued)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Alex H. Ryu (May 01)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Matthew Petach (May 02)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Dorian Kim (May 02)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Owen DeLong (May 02)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Randy Bush (May 03)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Michael Dillon (May 04)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Will Hargrave (May 03)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Dorian Kim (May 02)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Bill Stewart (May 03)
- RE: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? George Bonser (May 04)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Andy Davidson (May 09)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? aaron (May 01)
- Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? deleskie (May 01)