nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP (in)security makes the AP wire


From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 18:30:47 +0200

On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:54:46AM -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote:

And when I drive someplace, I do indeed go by the signs I see, which are
not erected by a central authority, as I move along.  (I don't have a
route from here to Fairbanks, Alaska, but my MCA shows one from here to
Council Bluffs, Iowa, and from there there are several I might use,
depending on what signs I see ("Warning, I29 N closed at Mondamin due to
flooding") when I get there.)

Speaking about that, is anyone currently seeing geographic (local-knowledge)
routing and authorityless address (=position) allocation from coordinates 
(e.g. WGS 84 position fixes) in any realistic time frame as a major component 
on the Internet?

Presumably, one could prototype something simple and cheap at L2 level 
with WGS 84->MAC (about ~m^2 resolution), custom switch firmware and GBIC 
for longish (1-70 km) distances, but without a mesh it won't work.
 
I'm sorry, but I am very afraid of "Central Authority".

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


Current thread: