nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:23:33 -0500
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 22:12 +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
On 3/20/10 8:37 PM, William Pitcock wrote:That is not what I mean and you know it.What do you mean than? Hank made a good point on the type of traffic normally going through these groups.
My point hasn't much to do with the NSP-SEC list, I know plenty well what traffic goes through there, but instead that the security community is not welcoming to new contributors. I do run a bloody DNSBL, after all. My point was also that there are people on the NSP-SEC list that can get things done faster than PSIRT/etc do on turnaround times. Many of those same people also exist on a certain irc channel that will remain unnamed, too. William
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC George Imburgia (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC James Bensley (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Rich Kulawiec (Mar 21)
- RE: NSP-SEC Alex Lanstein (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Lorand Jakab (Mar 22)