nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recommendations for reverse DNS providers
From: "Brielle Bruns" <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:19:18 +0000
Same general practices for forward dns apply to reverse as well - you should have a secondary on a separate netblock/provider/connection from the master nameserver. Also depends on what's going to be on the netblocks your hosting rdns for. If its a bunch of mail servers, rdns is kinda important from an anti-abuse perspective. Same with dynamic clients. ------Original Message------ From: Gregory Hicks To: nanog () nanog org To: mike.lyon () gmail com ReplyTo: Gregory Hicks Subject: Re: Recommendations for reverse DNS providers Sent: Mar 17, 2010 5:11 PM
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:08:03 -0700 From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com> Hello, I am curious what folks recommend these days for reverse DNS providers? UltraDNS? FreeDNS?
BIND No difference between a forward and reverse zone to BIND. Both work well...
Thank You, Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer | Direct: 408.569.7928 People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf -- George Orwell The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -- Thomas Jefferson "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton -- Brielle Bruns http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- Recommendations for reverse DNS providers Mike Lyon (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Recommendations for reverse DNS providers Gregory Hicks (Mar 17)
- Re: Recommendations for reverse DNS providers Brielle Bruns (Mar 17)