nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
From: Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:05:20 -0500
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
nope. in japan, there is still far more powerpoint than packets. i have ntt ftth. it is v4 only. i have to tunnel to iij to get v6. do not believe powerpoint.
NTT also charges its (wholesale) IP transit customers a premium for v6 connectivity in Asia. Dorian can speak better to their rationale, though I can't see it helping foster adoption in this economy. Drive Slow, Paul Wall
Current thread:
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Paul Wall (Mar 03)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Jared Mauch (Mar 03)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Jorge Amodio (Mar 03)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Jared Mauch (Mar 03)