nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network Naming Conventions
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:19:33 -0600 (CST)
So, for production network and server gear, I like domain names built with city and site codes: site.city.domain
I don't think anyone's saying you can't also do that. Using CLLI or IATA or whatever alongside router names works fine, and using CNAME's allows you to provide both a functional name and a hostname for your device. We've done this for many, many years, and it works fine. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
Current thread:
- Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions James Jones (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik L (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Ravi Pina (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Adcock, Matt [HISNA] (Mar 15)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Nathan Ward (Mar 15)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Joe Greco (Mar 15)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Greg Whynott (Mar 15)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions James Jones (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions James Jones (Mar 15)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions James Bensley (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Tim Sanderson (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Roy (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Barry Shein (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)