nanog mailing list archives
Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8
From: Brian Feeny <bfeeny () mac com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:06:02 -0500
On Mar 12, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
Axel Morawietz wrote:Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:[...] Its amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.* for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones. And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going to receive this route from external. ;)If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years, perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?
Only by people who don't know how to read RFC's and are probably responsible for screwing a bunch of other stuff up as well :) Brian
- Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8, (continued)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Joe Greco (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 david raistrick (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Joe Greco (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Matthew Kaufman (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Derek J. Balling (Mar 13)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Joe Greco (Mar 13)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Nathan (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Joe Greco (Mar 12)
- RE: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Mark Scholten (Mar 13)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 James Hess (Mar 13)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Brian Feeny (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Joel Jaeggli (Mar 13)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 12)
- Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8 Nathan (Mar 12)