nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:10:59 -0800
On 3/11/10 9:01 AM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change" - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is allocating /40s and /48s directly?
As far as I know, yes. ~Seth
Current thread:
- IPv6 enabled carriers? Charles Mills (Mar 10)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- RE: IPv6 enabled carriers? George Bonser (Mar 10)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Michael Hallgren (Mar 10)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Chris Woodfield (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Seth Mattinen (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? TJ (Mar 11)
- Filtered 6to4, what else to use (Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?) Jeroen Massar (Mar 11)
- Re: Filtered 6to4, what else to use (Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?) TJ (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Christopher Morrow (Mar 11)
- Re: Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? cb . list6 (Mar 11)
- Message not available
- RE: IPv6 enabled carriers? TJ (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Christopher Morrow (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Cameron Byrne (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)