nanog mailing list archives
RE: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group
From: "Arjan van der Oest" <arjan.van.der.oest () worldmax nl>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:24:23 +0100
Andy scribbled:
Competition is not a bad thing.Competition would be if I could approach the NCC or Pepsi Cola for
my
integers for use on the internet. It is not competition if the government makes me ask them for some integers.Assuming that ITU would become a nationwide alternative RIR, you
still
have the choice to approach NCC, wouldn't you?Why would this automatically be the case ? If governments were
required
to distribute addresses via the national regulator, then the freedom of choice would NOT be the case.
True. Like I said in my initial reply to members-discuss (and while playing a devil's advocate role), I'm not entirely sure what it is that ITU is striving for : replacing IANA or just becoming a nationwide RIR. In the latter case this would not automatically mean (also assuming that local governments will not further interfere in this process) that ITU would be your one and only one-stop-shop for integers. But anyhow, don't get me wrong. I agree with all that has been said on why and how ITU is trying to get a grip on packet switched communication networks. My only point it that it might not be a bad idea to ponder on the subject of allowing competition between RIR's in the same geographical aerea and hence allow ITU to achieve the status of nationwide RIR. If Telco's want to request their IP's from ITU instead of RIPE, they have my utterly blessings... *zipping my Dr. Pepper* -- Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards, Worldmax Operations B.V. Arjan van der Oest Network Design Engineer T.: +31 (0) 88 001 7912 F.: +31 (0) 88 001 7902 M.: +31 (0) 6 10 62 58 46 E.: arjan.van.der.oest () worldmax nl W.:www.worldmax.nl W.:www.aerea.nl GPG: https://keyserver.pgp.com/ (Key ID: 07286F78, fingerprint: 2E9F 3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78) Internet communications are not secure; therefore, the integrity of this e-mail cannot be guaranteed following transmission on the Internet. This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and erase this e-mail. Use of this e-mail by any person other than the addressee is strictly forbidden. This e-mail is believed to be free of any virus that might adversely affect the addressee's computer system; however, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. All the preceding disclaimers also apply to any possible attachments to this e-mail.
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Andy Davidson (Mar 01)
- Message not available
- Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Andy Davidson (Mar 01)
- RE: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Arjan van der Oest (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Jorge Amodio (Mar 01)
- Message not available
- RE: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Arjan van der Oest (Mar 01)
- Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Andy Davidson (Mar 01)
- Message not available
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group Jon Morby | fido (Mar 01)